🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume atomic talks with the United States as long as it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed new appeals had been made by mediators to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the global atomic watchdog to access struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Route

Araghchi is walking a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Talks Suddenly Ended

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that culminated with the American leader declaring the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, EU nations exercised their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the talks that American atomic experts could work within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Representatives claimed repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Status

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if discussions resume.

Trump in recent days stated he had been getting signals that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats say they are not yet getting clear proposals from the United States either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of passivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his address to the conference, designed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the idea of international law, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be settled by military means. He asserted the strikes started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making trust difficult to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Final Solution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly tried to enforce their demands during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and stays the primary resolution to settle disputes, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be followed."

"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the same approach."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the battle of restoration and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He stated: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to destroy, stays intact. The facilities and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the state in the wake of this attack."