Relatives' Heartache Regarding Shoreline Erosion Endangering Norfolk Graves
Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.
A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Past
One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril
Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
Searching for Solutions and Certainty
The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.
Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”
It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.